Six dimensions. Sixty seconds. A score against your peers, the three highest-leverage moves you can make this quarter, and the dimension that is silently undercutting everything else.
No sales call. No drip campaign. Your email unlocks the full report — that's the only thing we keep.
How fast a stranger understands what you do, who you do it for, and why it matters. Tested against your homepage, LinkedIn, and pitch deck if provided.
How well your content is structured for LLMs, zero-click search, and the new generation of AI assistants that are increasingly the first surface buyers touch.
Whether the company sounds like one mind across web, social, product copy, and sales. AI tools are the largest accelerant of voice drift.
How defensibly your positioning separates you from the named alternatives. We test your top three competitors and score the contrast.
The single highest-leverage quick win for most businesses. Whether your principals are publishing, speaking, and accumulating authority in public.
The story arc that connects your category, your moment, and your offer. Where most brands lose buyers without knowing why.
Website, LinkedIn, optional Instagram. Industry tag calibrates your score against the right peer set.
The audit pulls public materials and runs the six diagnostics. Most brands take 45–70 seconds.
You see your composite, your six sub-scores, and your position against three competitors of our choosing.
The full eight-page brief includes the three highest-leverage moves you can make this quarter.
Above average for Professional Services. Two dimensions are pulling the composite down by 1.4 points.
Top recommendation: Activate leadership voice. The CEO has no public content presence. Highest-leverage win in the next 90 days. Book a briefing →
The Brand Intelligence Audit diagnoses signal: positioning clarity, discoverability gaps, voice drift, narrative softness, public authority. It tells you what is visible from the outside.
The Strategic Brand Intelligence Review examines the system underneath. Where the gap is structural — in market position, in reputation architecture, in go-to-market alignment, in competitive defensibility — a higher score does not fix it. A re-architecture does.
The Review is conducted by a principal. It is not a deliverable. It is a four-week examination ending in a structural diagnosis and a twelve-month strategic direction.
Where the category is fracturing, where the market is moving, and which position is defensible across the next thirty-six months — not just the next campaign.
How institutional belief is accumulated around the company, where it leaks, and whose name carries it. The structural question behind every leadership-comms gap.
Whether what the company promises in the market and what it actually sells are the same shape. The most common — and least visible — cause of brand decay.
The category-level story the company is positioned to own — and whether it is currently being told by you, by an incumbent, or by no one. Examined against three named competitors.
What about the position is protectable, what is borrowed, and what is liable to be commoditized by AI within the next two cycles. Tested against the substitute landscape.
Not whether you appear in AI surfaces today, but whether the system around you compounds: schema, citations, third-party authority, the geometry of how machines read the brand over time.